CVE-2025-71160
中文标题:
(暂无数据)
英文标题:
netfilter: nf_tables: avoid chain re-validation if possible
漏洞描述
中文描述:
(暂无数据)
英文描述:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: avoid chain re-validation if possible Hamza Mahfooz reports cpu soft lock-ups in nft_chain_validate(): watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 27s! [iptables-nft-re:37547] [..] RIP: 0010:nft_chain_validate+0xcb/0x110 [nf_tables] [..] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_immediate_validate+0x36/0x50 [nf_tables] nft_chain_validate+0xc9/0x110 [nf_tables] nft_table_validate+0x6b/0xb0 [nf_tables] nf_tables_validate+0x8b/0xa0 [nf_tables] nf_tables_commit+0x1df/0x1eb0 [nf_tables] [..] Currently nf_tables will traverse the entire table (chain graph), starting from the entry points (base chains), exploring all possible paths (chain jumps). But there are cases where we could avoid revalidation. Consider: 1 input -> j2 -> j3 2 input -> j2 -> j3 3 input -> j1 -> j2 -> j3 Then the second rule does not need to revalidate j2, and, by extension j3, because this was already checked during validation of the first rule. We need to validate it only for rule 3. This is needed because chain loop detection also ensures we do not exceed the jump stack: Just because we know that j2 is cycle free, its last jump might now exceed the allowed stack size. We also need to update all reachable chains with the new largest observed call depth. Care has to be taken to revalidate even if the chain depth won't be an issue: chain validation also ensures that expressions are not called from invalid base chains. For example, the masquerade expression can only be called from NAT postrouting base chains. Therefore we also need to keep record of the base chain context (type, hooknum) and revalidate if the chain becomes reachable from a different hook location.
CWE类型:
标签:
受影响产品
| 厂商 | 产品 | 版本 | 版本范围 | 平台 | CPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | - | < 53de1e6cde8f9b791d9cf61aa0e7b02cf5bbe8b1 | - |
cpe:2.3:a:linux:linux:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
解决方案
中文解决方案:
英文解决方案:
临时解决方案:
CVSS评分详情
NOT_EXTRACTED
时间信息
利用信息
数据源详情
| 数据源 | 记录ID | 版本 | 提取时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE | cve_CVE-2025-71160 |
2026-01-24 03:17:27 | 2026-01-23 22:00:09 |
| NVD | nvd_CVE-2025-71160 |
2026-01-24 02:00:05 | 2026-01-23 22:00:19 |
版本与语言
安全公告
变更历史
查看详细变更
- affected_products_count: 5 -> 1
- data_sources: ['cve'] -> ['cve', 'nvd']