结构: Simple
Abstraction: Base
状态: Draft
被利用可能性: High
The software contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data.
Hard-coded credentials typically create a significant hole that allows an attacker to bypass the authentication that has been configured by the software administrator. This hole might be difficult for the system administrator to detect. Even if detected, it can be difficult to fix, so the administrator may be forced into disabling the product entirely. There are two main variations:
In the Inbound variant, a default administration account is created, and a simple password is hard-coded into the product and associated with that account. This hard-coded password is the same for each installation of the product, and it usually cannot be changed or disabled by system administrators without manually modifying the program, or otherwise patching the software. If the password is ever discovered or published (a common occurrence on the Internet), then anybody with knowledge of this password can access the product. Finally, since all installations of the software will have the same password, even across different organizations, this enables massive attacks such as worms to take place.
The Outbound variant applies to front-end systems that authenticate with a back-end service. The back-end service may require a fixed password which can be easily discovered. The programmer may simply hard-code those back-end credentials into the front-end software. Any user of that program may be able to extract the password. Client-side systems with hard-coded passwords pose even more of a threat, since the extraction of a password from a binary is usually very simple.
cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 287 cwe_View_ID: 1000 cwe_Ordinal: Primary
cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 287 cwe_View_ID: 1003 cwe_Ordinal: Primary
cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 344 cwe_View_ID: 1000
cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 671 cwe_View_ID: 1000
cwe_Nature: PeerOf cwe_CWE_ID: 257 cwe_View_ID: 1000
Language: {'cwe_Class': 'Language-Independent', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Undetermined'}
Paradigm: {'cwe_Name': 'Mobile', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Undetermined'}
范围 | 影响 | 注释 |
---|---|---|
Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism | If hard-coded passwords are used, it is almost certain that malicious users will gain access to the account in question. |
['Integrity', 'Confidentiality', 'Availability', 'Access Control', 'Other'] | ['Read Application Data', 'Gain Privileges or Assume Identity', 'Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands', 'Other'] | This weakness can lead to the exposure of resources or functionality to unintended actors, possibly providing attackers with sensitive information or even execute arbitrary code. |
These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules.
For hard-coded credentials in incoming authentication: use monitoring tools that examine the software's process as it interacts with the operating system and the network. This technique is useful in cases when source code is unavailable, if the software was not developed by you, or if you want to verify that the build phase did not introduce any new weaknesses. Examples include debuggers that directly attach to the running process; system-call tracing utilities such as truss (Solaris) and strace (Linux); system activity monitors such as FileMon, RegMon, Process Monitor, and other Sysinternals utilities (Windows); and sniffers and protocol analyzers that monitor network traffic.
Attach the monitor to the process and perform a login. Using call trees or similar artifacts from the output, examine the associated behaviors and see if any of them appear to be comparing the input to a fixed string or value.
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
策略:
For outbound authentication: store passwords, keys, and other credentials outside of the code in a strongly-protected, encrypted configuration file or database that is protected from access by all outsiders, including other local users on the same system. Properly protect the key (CWE-320). If you cannot use encryption to protect the file, then make sure that the permissions are as restrictive as possible [REF-7]. In Windows environments, the Encrypted File System (EFS) may provide some protection.
策略:
For inbound authentication: Rather than hard-code a default username and password, key, or other authentication credentials for first time logins, utilize a "first login" mode that requires the user to enter a unique strong password or key.
策略:
If the software must contain hard-coded credentials or they cannot be removed, perform access control checks and limit which entities can access the feature that requires the hard-coded credentials. For example, a feature might only be enabled through the system console instead of through a network connection.
策略:
For inbound authentication using passwords: apply strong one-way hashes to passwords and store those hashes in a configuration file or database with appropriate access control. That way, theft of the file/database still requires the attacker to try to crack the password. When handling an incoming password during authentication, take the hash of the password and compare it to the saved hash. Use randomly assigned salts for each separate hash that is generated. This increases the amount of computation that an attacker needs to conduct a brute-force attack, possibly limiting the effectiveness of the rainbow table method.
策略: For front-end to back-end connections: Three solutions are possible, although none are complete.
The following code uses a hard-coded password to connect to a database:
bad Java
This is an example of an external hard-coded password on the client-side of a connection. This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to it will have access to the password. Once the program has shipped, there is no going back from the database user "scott" with a password of "tiger" unless the program is patched. A devious employee with access to this information can use it to break into the system. Even worse, if attackers have access to the bytecode for application, they can use the javap -c command to access the disassembled code, which will contain the values of the passwords used. The result of this operation might look something like the following for the example above:
attack
The following code is an example of an internal hard-coded password in the back-end:
bad C
bad Java
Every instance of this program can be placed into diagnostic mode with the same password. Even worse is the fact that if this program is distributed as a binary-only distribution, it is very difficult to change that password or disable this "functionality."
The following code examples attempt to verify a password using a hard-coded cryptographic key.
bad C
bad Java
bad C#
The cryptographic key is within a hard-coded string value that is compared to the password. It is likely that an attacker will be able to read the key and compromise the system.
The following examples show a portion of properties and configuration files for Java and ASP.NET applications. The files include username and password information but they are stored in plaintext.
This Java example shows a properties file with a plaintext username / password pair.
bad Java
The following example shows a portion of a configuration file for an ASP.Net application. This configuration file includes username and password information for a connection to a database but the pair is stored in plaintext.
bad ASP.NET
Username and password information should not be included in a configuration file or a properties file in plaintext as this will allow anyone who can read the file access to the resource. If possible, encrypt this information and avoid CWE-260 and CWE-13.
标识 | 说明 | 链接 |
---|---|---|
CVE-2010-2772 | SCADA system uses a hard-coded password to protect back-end database containing authorization information, exploited by Stuxnet worm | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2772 |
CVE-2010-2073 | FTP server library uses hard-coded usernames and passwords for three default accounts | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2073 |
CVE-2010-1573 | Chain: Router firmware uses hard-coded username and password for access to debug functionality, which can be used to execute arbitrary code | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-1573 |
CVE-2008-2369 | Server uses hard-coded authentication key | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-2369 |
CVE-2008-0961 | Backup product uses hard-coded username and password, allowing attackers to bypass authentication via the RPC interface | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-0961 |
CVE-2008-1160 | Security appliance uses hard-coded password allowing attackers to gain root access | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1160 |
CVE-2006-7142 | Drive encryption product stores hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypted configuration files in executable programs | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-7142 |
CVE-2005-3716 | VoIP product uses unchangeable hard-coded public credentials that cannot be changed, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-3716 |
CVE-2005-3803 | VoIP product uses hard coded public and private SNMP community strings that cannot be changed, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-3803 |
CVE-2005-0496 | Backup product contains hard-coded credentials that effectively serve as a back door, which allows remote attackers to access the file system | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-0496 |
映射的分类名 | ImNode ID | Fit | Mapped Node Name |
---|---|---|---|
The CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java (2011) | MSC03-J | Never hard code sensitive information | |
OMG ASCSM | ASCSM-CWE-798 |