结构: Simple
Abstraction: Class
状态: Draft
被利用可能性: Medium
The software does not initialize or incorrectly initializes a resource, which might leave the resource in an unexpected state when it is accessed or used.
This can have security implications when the associated resource is expected to have certain properties or values, such as a variable that determines whether a user has been authenticated or not.
Language: {'cwe_Class': 'Language-Independent', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Undetermined'}
范围 | 影响 | 注释 |
---|---|---|
Confidentiality | ['Read Memory', 'Read Application Data'] | When reusing a resource such as memory or a program variable, the original contents of that resource may not be cleared before it is sent to an untrusted party. |
Access Control | Bypass Protection Mechanism | If security-critical decisions rely on a variable having a "0" or equivalent value, and the programming language performs this initialization on behalf of the programmer, then a bypass of security may occur. |
Availability | DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart | The uninitialized data may contain values that cause program flow to change in ways that the programmer did not intend. For example, if an uninitialized variable is used as an array index in C, then its previous contents may produce an index that is outside the range of the array, possibly causing a crash or an exit in other environments. |
This weakness can be detected using dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the software using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The software's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Initialization problems may be detected with a stress-test by calling the software simultaneously from a large number of threads or processes, and look for evidence of any unexpected behavior. The software's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
策略: Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, in Java, if the programmer does not explicitly initialize a variable, then the code could produce a compile-time error (if the variable is local) or automatically initialize the variable to the default value for the variable's type. In Perl, if explicit initialization is not performed, then a default value of undef is assigned, which is interpreted as 0, false, or an equivalent value depending on the context in which the variable is accessed.
策略:
Identify all variables and data stores that receive information from external sources, and apply input validation to make sure that they are only initialized to expected values.
策略:
Explicitly initialize all your variables and other data stores, either during declaration or just before the first usage.
策略:
Pay close attention to complex conditionals that affect initialization, since some conditions might not perform the initialization.
策略:
Avoid race conditions (CWE-362) during initialization routines.
策略:
Run or compile your software with settings that generate warnings about uninitialized variables or data.
策略:
Use automated static analysis tools that target this type of weakness. Many modern techniques use data flow analysis to minimize the number of false positives. This is not a perfect solution, since 100% accuracy and coverage are not feasible.
Here, a boolean initiailized field is consulted to ensure that initialization tasks are only completed once. However, the field is mistakenly set to true during static initialization, so the initialization code is never reached.
bad Java
The following code intends to limit certain operations to the administrator only.
bad Perl
If the application is unable to extract the state information - say, due to a database timeout - then the $uid variable will not be explicitly set by the programmer. This will cause $uid to be regarded as equivalent to "0" in the conditional, allowing the original user to perform administrator actions. Even if the attacker cannot directly influence the state data, unexpected errors could cause incorrect privileges to be assigned to a user just by accident.
The following code intends to concatenate a string to a variable and print the string.
bad C
This might seem innocent enough, but str was not initialized, so it contains random memory. As a result, str[0] might not contain the null terminator, so the copy might start at an offset other than 0. The consequences can vary, depending on the underlying memory.
If a null terminator is found before str[8], then some bytes of random garbage will be printed before the "hello world" string. The memory might contain sensitive information from previous uses, such as a password (which might occur as a result of CWE-14 or CWE-244). In this example, it might not be a big deal, but consider what could happen if large amounts of memory are printed out before the null terminator is found.
If a null terminator isn't found before str[8], then a buffer overflow could occur, since strcat will first look for the null terminator, then copy 12 bytes starting with that location. Alternately, a buffer over-read might occur (CWE-126) if a null terminator isn't found before the end of the memory segment is reached, leading to a segmentation fault and crash.
标识 | 说明 | 链接 |
---|---|---|
CVE-2001-1471 | chain: an invalid value prevents a library file from being included, skipping initialization of key variables, leading to resultant eval injection. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2001-1471 |
CVE-2008-3637 | Improper error checking in protection mechanism produces an uninitialized variable, allowing security bypass and code execution. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-3637 |
CVE-2008-4197 | Use of uninitialized memory may allow code execution. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-4197 |
CVE-2008-2934 | Free of an uninitialized pointer leads to crash and possible code execution. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-2934 |
CVE-2007-3749 | OS kernel does not reset a port when starting a setuid program, allowing local users to access the port and gain privileges. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-3749 |
CVE-2008-0063 | Product does not clear memory contents when generating an error message, leading to information leak. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-0063 |
CVE-2008-0062 | Lack of initialization triggers NULL pointer dereference or double-free. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-0062 |
CVE-2008-0081 | Uninitialized variable leads to code execution in popular desktop application. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-0081 |
CVE-2008-3688 | chain: Uninitialized variable leads to infinite loop. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-3688 |
CVE-2008-3475 | chain: Improper initialization leads to memory corruption. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-3475 |
CVE-2008-5021 | Composite: race condition allows attacker to modify an object while it is still being initialized, causing software to access uninitialized memory. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-5021 |
CVE-2005-1036 | Permission bitmap is not properly initialized, leading to resultant privilege elevation or DoS. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-1036 |
CVE-2008-3597 | chain: game server can access player data structures before initialization has happened leading to NULL dereference | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-3597 |
CVE-2009-2692 | chain: uninitialized function pointers can be dereferenced allowing code execution | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2692 |
CVE-2009-0949 | chain: improper initialization of memory can lead to NULL dereference | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0949 |
CVE-2009-3620 | chain: some unprivileged ioctls do not verify that a structure has been initialized before invocation, leading to NULL dereference | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3620 |
映射的分类名 | ImNode ID | Fit | Mapped Node Name |
---|---|---|---|
PLOVER | Incorrect initialization | ||
CERT C Secure Coding | ARR02-C | Explicitly specify array bounds, even if implicitly defined by an initializer | |
The CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java (2011) | DCL00-J | Prevent class initialization cycles | |
Software Fault Patterns | SFP4 | Unchecked Status Condition |