结构: Simple
Abstraction: Class
状态: Stable
被利用可能性: High
The software performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer.
Certain languages allow direct addressing of memory locations and do not automatically ensure that these locations are valid for the memory buffer that is being referenced. This can cause read or write operations to be performed on memory locations that may be associated with other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
As a result, an attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code, alter the intended control flow, read sensitive information, or cause the system to crash.
cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 118 cwe_View_ID: 1000 cwe_Ordinal: Primary
cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 20 cwe_View_ID: 700 cwe_Ordinal: Primary
Language: [{'cwe_Name': 'C', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Often'}, {'cwe_Name': 'C++', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Often'}, {'cwe_Class': 'Assembly', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Undetermined'}]
范围 | 影响 | 注释 |
---|---|---|
['Integrity', 'Confidentiality', 'Availability'] | ['Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands', 'Modify Memory'] | If the memory accessible by the attacker can be effectively controlled, it may be possible to execute arbitrary code, as with a standard buffer overflow. If the attacker can overwrite a pointer's worth of memory (usually 32 or 64 bits), they can redirect a function pointer to their own malicious code. Even when the attacker can only modify a single byte arbitrary code execution can be possible. Sometimes this is because the same problem can be exploited repeatedly to the same effect. Other times it is because the attacker can overwrite security-critical application-specific data -- such as a flag indicating whether the user is an administrator. |
['Availability', 'Confidentiality'] | ['Read Memory', 'DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart', 'DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)', 'DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)'] | Out of bounds memory access will very likely result in the corruption of relevant memory, and perhaps instructions, possibly leading to a crash. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop. |
Confidentiality | Read Memory | In the case of an out-of-bounds read, the attacker may have access to sensitive information. If the sensitive information contains system details, such as the current buffers position in memory, this knowledge can be used to craft further attacks, possibly with more severe consequences. |
This weakness can often be detected using automated static analysis tools. Many modern tools use data flow analysis or constraint-based techniques to minimize the number of false positives.
Automated static analysis generally does not account for environmental considerations when reporting out-of-bounds memory operations. This can make it difficult for users to determine which warnings should be investigated first. For example, an analysis tool might report buffer overflows that originate from command line arguments in a program that is not expected to run with setuid or other special privileges.
Detection techniques for buffer-related errors are more mature than for most other weakness types.
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
策略: Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
策略: Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
策略: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run or compile the software using features or extensions that automatically provide a protection mechanism that mitigates or eliminates buffer overflows. For example, certain compilers and extensions provide automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are built into the compiled code. Examples include the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice.
策略: Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
策略: Environment Hardening
Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64].
策略: Environment Hardening
Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (NX) or its equivalent [REF-60] [REF-61].
策略:
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
bad C
This function allocates a buffer of 64 bytes to store the hostname, however there is no guarantee that the hostname will not be larger than 64 bytes. If an attacker specifies an address which resolves to a very large hostname, then we may overwrite sensitive data or even relinquish control flow to the attacker.
Note that this example also contains an unchecked return value (CWE-252) that can lead to a NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476).
This example applies an encoding procedure to an input string and stores it into a buffer.
bad C
The programmer attempts to encode the ampersand character in the user-controlled string, however the length of the string is validated before the encoding procedure is applied. Furthermore, the programmer assumes encoding expansion will only expand a given character by a factor of 4, while the encoding of the ampersand expands by 5. As a result, when the encoding procedure expands the string it is possible to overflow the destination buffer if the attacker provides a string of many ampersands.
The following example asks a user for an offset into an array to select an item.
bad C
The programmer allows the user to specify which element in the list to select, however an attacker can provide an out-of-bounds offset, resulting in a buffer over-read (CWE-126).
In the following code, the method retrieves a value from an array at a specific array index location that is given as an input parameter to the method
bad C
However, this method only verifies that the given array index is less than the maximum length of the array but does not check for the minimum value (CWE-839). This will allow a negative value to be accepted as the input array index, which will result in a out of bounds read (CWE-125) and may allow access to sensitive memory. The input array index should be checked to verify that is within the maximum and minimum range required for the array (CWE-129). In this example the if statement should be modified to include a minimum range check, as shown below.
good C
Windows provides the _mbs family of functions to perform various operations on multibyte strings. When these functions are passed a malformed multibyte string, such as a string containing a valid leading byte followed by a single null byte, they can read or write past the end of the string buffer causing a buffer overflow. The following functions all pose a risk of buffer overflow: _mbsinc _mbsdec _mbsncat _mbsncpy _mbsnextc _mbsnset _mbsrev _mbsset _mbsstr _mbstok _mbccpy _mbslen
标识 | 说明 | 链接 |
---|---|---|
CVE-2009-2550 | Classic stack-based buffer overflow in media player using a long entry in a playlist | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2550 |
CVE-2009-2403 | Heap-based buffer overflow in media player using a long entry in a playlist | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2403 |
CVE-2009-0689 | large precision value in a format string triggers overflow | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0689 |
CVE-2009-0690 | negative offset value leads to out-of-bounds read | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0690 |
CVE-2009-1532 | malformed inputs cause accesses of uninitialized or previously-deleted objects, leading to memory corruption | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-1532 |
CVE-2009-1528 | chain: lack of synchronization leads to memory corruption | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-1528 |
CVE-2009-0558 | attacker-controlled array index leads to code execution | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0558 |
CVE-2009-0269 | chain: -1 value from a function call was intended to indicate an error, but is used as an array index instead. | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0269 |
CVE-2009-0566 | chain: incorrect calculations lead to incorrect pointer dereference and memory corruption | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0566 |
CVE-2009-1350 | product accepts crafted messages that lead to a dereference of an arbitrary pointer | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-1350 |
CVE-2009-0191 | chain: malformed input causes dereference of uninitialized memory | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0191 |
CVE-2008-4113 | OS kernel trusts userland-supplied length value, allowing reading of sensitive information | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-4113 |
CVE-2003-0542 | buffer overflow involving a regular expression with a large number of captures | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2003-0542 |
CVE-2017-1000121 | chain: unchecked message size metadata allows integer overflow (CWE-190) leading to buffer overflow (CWE-119). | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-1000121 |
映射的分类名 | ImNode ID | Fit | Mapped Node Name |
---|---|---|---|
OWASP Top Ten 2004 | A5 | Exact | Buffer Overflows |
CERT C Secure Coding | ARR00-C | Understand how arrays work | |
CERT C Secure Coding | ARR30-C | CWE More Abstract | Do not form or use out-of-bounds pointers or array subscripts |
CERT C Secure Coding | ARR38-C | CWE More Abstract | Guarantee that library functions do not form invalid pointers |
CERT C Secure Coding | ENV01-C | Do not make assumptions about the size of an environment variable | |
CERT C Secure Coding | EXP39-C | Imprecise | Do not access a variable through a pointer of an incompatible type |
CERT C Secure Coding | FIO37-C | Do not assume character data has been read | |
CERT C Secure Coding | STR31-C | CWE More Abstract | Guarantee that storage for strings has sufficient space for character data and the null terminator |
CERT C Secure Coding | STR32-C | CWE More Abstract | Do not pass a non-null-terminated character sequence to a library function that expects a string |
WASC | 7 | Buffer Overflow | |
Software Fault Patterns | SFP8 | Faulty Buffer Access |