CVE-2005-2937
CVSSN/A
发布时间 :2005-10-12 09:04:00
修订时间 :2008-09-10 15:44:15
NMOPS    

[原文]** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3663, CVE-2005-3664. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but multiple advisories used this candidate for different issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2005-3663 and CVE-2005-3664 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.


[CNNVD]CNNVD数据暂缺。


[机译]* REJECT **不要使用该候选号码。

- CVSS (基础分值)

CVSS暂不可用

- CPE (受影响的平台与产品)

产品及版本信息(CPE)暂不可用

- OVAL (用于检测的技术细节)

未找到相关OVAL定义

- 官方数据库链接

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-2937
(官方数据源) MITRE
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2005-2937
(官方数据源) NVD

- 其它链接及资源

- 漏洞信息 (F41659)

iDEFENSE Security Advisory 2005-11-15.2 (PacketStormID:F41659)
2005-11-20 00:00:00
iDefense Labs  idefense.com
advisory
windows
CVE-2005-2936,CVE-2005-2937,CVE-2005-2938,CVE-2005-2939,CVE-2005-2940
[点击下载]

iDEFENSE Security Advisory 11.15.05 - The Microsoft Windows API includes the CreateProcess() function as a means to create a new process and it's primary thread. CreateProcessAsUser() is similar but allows for the process to be run in the security context of a particular user.

Multiple Vendor Insecure Call to CreateProcess() Vulnerability

iDEFENSE Security Advisory 11.15.05
www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=340&type=vulnerabilities
November 15, 2005

I. BACKGROUND

The Microsoft Windows API includes the CreateProcess() function as a
means to create a new process and it's primary thread.
CreateProcessAsUser() is similar but allows for the process to be run in
the security context of a particular user.

II. DESCRIPTION

The format of the CreateProcess() function is as follows:

BOOL CreateProcess(
  LPCTSTR lpApplicationName,
  LPTSTR lpCommandLine,
  LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpProcessAttributes,
  LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpThreadAttributes,
  BOOL bInheritHandles,
  DWORD dwCreationFlags,
  LPVOID lpEnvironment,
  LPCTSTR lpCurrentDirectory,
  LPSTARTUPINFO lpStartupInfo,
  LPPROCESS_INFORMATION lpProcessInformation
);

The 'lpApplicationName' variable contains the name of the module to be
executed. However, this can be a NULL value, in which case, the module
name to be executed will be the first white space-delimited token in the
lpCommandLine string.

It is a known issue, that if lpApplicationName contains a NULL value and
the full module path in the lpCommandLine variable contains white space
and is not enclosed in quotation marks, it is possible that an alternate
application will be executed. Consider the following scenario:

   CreateProcess(
      NULL,
      c:\program files\sub dir\program.exe,
      ...
   );

In this case, the system will successively expand the string when
interpreting the file path, until a module is encountered to execute.
The string used in the above example would be interpreted as follows:

   c:\program.exe files\sub dir\program name
   c:\program files\sub.exe dir\program name
   c:\program files\sub dir\program.exe

Therefore, if a file named program.exe existed in the c:\ directory, it
would be executed instead of the intended application. This is a known
issue, discussed directly in the API documentation:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dllproc/base/createprocessasuser.asp

III. ANALYSIS

Despite the fact that this is a known issue, several popular
applications, insecurely call the CreateProcess() and
CreateProcessAsUser() functions. This creates a scenario whereby
arbitrary code could be executed. In the scenario detailed above, if an
attacker were able to install arbitrary code in a file at
c:\program.exe, when the vulnerable application was launched, the code
would be executed. The arbitrary code would generally be executed under
the privileges of the executing user but could also be launched with
elevated privilegs if an insecure call were made CreateProcessAsUser()
using elevated privileges. This attack would involve some form of social
engineering or need to be combined with another attack to first get the
arbitrary code installed in the correct location.

IV. DETECTION

The following applications have been confirmed to be vulnerable:

Vendor:                RealNetworks
Application:     RealPlayer 10.5
Files:                realplay.exe
                            realjbox.exe
                           
Vendor:                Kaspersky
Application:     Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Windows File Servers 5.0 
(English) - Installation File
Files:                kav5.0trial_winfsen.exe

Vendor:                Apple
Application:     iTunes 4.7.1.30
Files:                iTunesHelper.exe

Vendor:                VMWare
Application:     VMWare Workstation 5.0.0 build-13124
Files:                VMwareTray.exe
                            VMwareUser.exe
                           
Vendor:                Microsoft
Application:     Microsoft Antispyware 1.0.509 (Beta 1)
Files:                GIANTAntiSpywareMain.exe
                            gcASNotice.exe
                            gcasServ.exe
                            gcasSWUpdater.exe
                            GIANTAntiSpywareUpdater.exe

Note: The vulnerability in Microsoft Antispyware was previously
discussed on the Full-Disclosure mailing list
(http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-May/033909.html)
but remains unpatched.

V. WORKAROUND

Ensure that unexpected files are not stored in locations that can be
used for this attack. Windows XP SP2 will alert a user of the existence
of a file named c:\program.exe when it first boots, however, any path
containing white space where a vulnerable application is stored could be
used in this attack.

VI. VENDOR RESPONSE

The following vendor responses have been provided.

Apple:

"Due to the way iTunes 5 launches its helper application, multiple
system paths are searched for which program to run. This may allow a
malicious user on the local system to create an environment where an
alternate program will be executed by iTunes. iTunes 6 addresses this
issue and can be obtained from http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/.
Credit to iDEFENSE for reporting this issue to us."

Kaspersky:

"We are currently looking into the problem, and it seems that this is
not present in the current version of KAV for File Servers."

Microsoft:

"Microsoft has confirmed that the Beta 2 version of its Antispyware
product, targeted for release later this year, will address the issue
reported by iDEFENSE."

VII. CVE INFORMATION

The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project has assigned the
following names to this issue.

RealNetworks RealPlayer 10.5
  CAN-2005-2936

Kaspersky Anti-Virus 5.0
  CAN-2005-2937

Apple iTunes 4.7.1.30
  CAN-2005-2938

VMWare Workstation 5.0.0 build-13124
  CAN-2005-2939

Microsoft Antispyware 1.0.509 (Beta 1)
  CAN-2005-2940

Theses are candidates for inclusion in the CVE list
(http://cve.mitre.org), which standardizes names for security problems.

VIII. DISCLOSURE TIMELINE

09/19/2005  Initial vendor notification
11/15/2005  Coordinated public disclosure

IX. CREDIT

The discoverer of this vulnerability wishes to remain anonymous.

Get paid for vulnerability research
http://www.idefense.com/poi/teams/vcp.jsp

Free tools, research and upcoming events
http://labs.idefense.com

X. LEGAL NOTICES

Copyright     

- 漏洞信息 (F40575)

iDEFENSE Security Advisory 2005-10-10.2 (PacketStormID:F40575)
2005-10-11 00:00:00
iDefense Labs  idefense.com
advisory,remote,overflow,arbitrary,virus
linux
CVE-2005-2937
[点击下载]

iDEFENSE Security Advisory 10.10.05-2 - Remote exploitation of a buffer overflow vulnerability in Kaspersky Labs' Anti-Virus Engine allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. Kaspersky Anti-Virus Engine is used by multiple vendors in Linux virus scanner products and exploitation requires minimal interaction by a targeted user.

Kaspersky Anti-Virus Engine CHM File Parser Buffer Overflow
Vulnerability

iDEFENSE Security Advisory 10.10.05
www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=318&type=vulnerabilities
October 10, 2005

I. BACKGROUND

Kaspersky Anti-Virus Engine (KAV) is a popular virus scanning engine 
for Windows and Linux. The Kaspersky Anti-Virus Engine is commonly 
included in various vendors' network mail gateway and host-based anti-
virus products. 

II. DESCRIPTION

Remote exploitation of a buffer overflow vulnerability in Kaspersky 
Labs' Anti-Virus Engine allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary 
code. Kaspersky Anti-Virus Engine is used by multiple vendors in Linux 
virus scanner products and exploitation requires minimal interaction by 
a targeted user.

The Kasperksy Anti-Virus Engine (KAV) is found in many gateway and 
host-based anti-virus scanners. The vulnerability specifically exists 
in the CHM file parser within the KAV engine. When a corrupt CHM file 
is scanned by the KAV engine, a heap overflow can occur which allows 
remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with permissions of the 
anti-virus application's process, usually user privileges. On Microsoft 
platforms, affected software has not been shown to execute arbitrary 
code, however Kaspersky Anti-Virus will fail to scan any files after a 
corrupt CHM file has been encountered, thus allowing further malicious 
codes to reach the target.

III. ANALYSIS

Successful exploitation of the vulnerability can result in remote 
arbitrary code execution or the disabling of anti-virus functionality. 
In the case of Linux platforms, specifically network gateways, user 
interaction is not required and can lead to the compromise of trusted 
systems. In addition, compromising mail gateways can lead to further 
compromise of internal hosts by injecting malicious code into mail 
attachments.

IV. DETECTION

iDEFENSE Labs has confirmed the existence of this vulnerability in the 
following products (tested April 2005):

    * Kaspersky Personal 5.0.227
    * Kaspersky Anti-Virus On-Demand Scanner for Linux 5.0.5
    * F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux 4.50

All products utilizing the Kaspersky Anti-Virus engine are potentially 
vulnerable.

The vendor has notified iDEFENSE that the vulnerability has been 
addressed via a signature update. Users who have updated their 
signatures after July 2005 are reportedly not affected.    

V. WORKAROUND

iDEFENSE is currently unaware of any effective workarounds for this 
issue. 

VI. VENDOR RESPONSE

The vendor has notified iDEFENSE that the vulnerability has been 
addressed via a signature update. Users who have updated their 
signatures after July 2005 are reportedly not affected. Update your 
anti-virus signatures to ensure the vulnerability has been addressed.

VII. CVE INFORMATION

The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project has assigned the
name CAN-2005-2937 to this issue. This is a candidate for inclusion in
the CVE list (http://cve.mitre.org), which standardizes names for
security problems.

VIII. DISCLOSURE TIMELINE

06/20/2005  Initial vendor notification
10/05/2005  Initial vendor response
10/10/2005  Public disclosure

IX. CREDIT

The discoverer of this vulnerability wishes to remain anonymous.

Get paid for vulnerability research
http://www.idefense.com/poi/teams/vcp.jsp

Free tools, research and upcoming events
http://labs.idefense.com

X. LEGAL NOTICES

Copyright (c) 2005 iDEFENSE, Inc.

Permission is granted for the redistribution of this alert
electronically. It may not be edited in any way without the express
written consent of iDEFENSE. If you wish to reprint the whole or any
part of this alert in any other medium other than electronically, please
email customerservice@idefense.com for permission.

Disclaimer: The information in the advisory is believed to be accurate
at the time of publishing based on currently available information. Use
of the information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition.
There are no warranties with regard to this information. Neither the
author nor the publisher accepts any liability for any direct, indirect,
or consequential loss or damage arising from use of, or reliance on,
this information.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
    

- 漏洞信息

21009
Kaspersky Anti-Virus Search Path Subversion Local Privilege Escalation
Local Access Required Input Manipulation
Loss of Integrity

- 漏洞描述

- 时间线

2005-11-15 2005-09-19
Unknow Unknow

- 解决方案

Upgrade to version 6 or higher, as it has been reported to fix this vulnerability. An upgrade is required as there are no known workarounds.

- 相关参考

- 漏洞作者

Unknown or Incomplete

- 漏洞信息

Multiple Vendor lpCommandLine Application Path Vulnerability
Design Error 15448
No Yes
2005-11-16 12:00:00 2009-07-12 05:56:00
Discovery is credited to an anonymous source.

- 受影响的程序版本

VMWare Workstation 5.0 .0 build-13124
Real Networks RealPlayer 8
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.5 v6.0.12.1348
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.5 v6.0.12.1235
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.5 v6.0.12.1069
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.5 v6.0.12.1059
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.5 v6.0.12.1056
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.5 v6.0.12.1053
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.5 v6.0.12.1040
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.5
Real Networks RealPlayer 10.0
+ S.u.S.E. cvsup-16.1h-43.i586.rpm
+ S.u.S.E. Linux Personal 9.3
+ S.u.S.E. Linux Personal 9.2
Real Networks RealOne Player 2.0
Real Networks RealOne Player 1.0
Microsoft AntiSpyware 1.0.509 (Beta 1)
Kaspersky Labs Anti-Virus for Windows File Servers 5.0

- 漏洞讨论

Multiple vendor applications are prone to an arbitrary local code-execution vulnerability.

This is due to a design error in which malicious code may be executed in the context of the user running the affected application.

- 漏洞利用

No exploit is required.

- 解决方案



Currently we are not aware of any vendor-supplied patches for this issue. If you feel we are in error or are aware of more recent information, please mail us at: vuldb@securityfocus.com

Please see the references for more information and fixes.

- 相关参考

 

 

关于SCAP中文社区

SCAP中文社区是国内第一个以SCAP为主题的中文开放社区。了解更多信息,请查阅[关于本站]

版权声明

CVE/CWE/OVAL均为MITRE公司的注册商标,它们的官方数据源均保存在MITRE公司的相关网站