|发布时间 :2004-10-20 00:00:00|
|修订时间 :2016-10-17 22:40:12|
[原文]Multiple content security gateway and antivirus products allow remote attackers to bypass content restrictions via MIME messages that use non-standard but frequently supported Content-Transfer-Encoding values such as (1) uuencode, (2) mac-binhex40, and (3) yenc, which may be interpreted differently by mail clients.
多个内容安全网关和杀毒产品存在漏洞。远程攻击者借助MIME消息绕过内容限制，该MIME消息使用不标准的但是经常支持Content-Transfer-Encoding的值，例如：(1) uuencode、(2) mac-binhex40以及(3) yenc，这可能被邮件客户解释为不同内容。
- CVSS (基础分值)
- CPE (受影响的平台与产品)
- OVAL (用于检测的技术细节)
(UNKNOWN) BUGTRAQ 20040914 Corsaire Security Advisory - Multiple vendor MIME Content-Transfer-Encoding mechanism issue
(VENDOR_ADVISORY) MISC http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/380375/mime.htm
(UNKNOWN) XF mime-contenttransfer-filter-bypass(17337)
|2004-10-20 00:00:00||2006-08-22 00:00:00|
|多个内容安全网关和杀毒产品存在漏洞。远程攻击者借助MIME消息绕过内容限制，该MIME消息使用不标准的但是经常支持Content-Transfer-Encoding的值，例如：(1) uuencode、(2) mac-binhex40以及(3) yenc，这可能被邮件客户解释为不同内容。|
plDaniels have released ripMime 18.104.22.168 to address this issue.
F-Secure will be releasing Internet Gatekeeper 6.41 to address this issue in Q4/04.
plDaniels ripMime 1.2 .0
plDaniels ripMime 1.2.1
plDaniels ripMime 1.2.2
plDaniels ripMime 1.2.3
plDaniels ripMime 1.2.4
plDaniels ripMime 1.2.5
plDaniels ripMime 1.2.6
plDaniels ripMime 1.2.7
plDaniels ripMime 1.3.2 .3
plDaniels ripMime 1.3.2 .0
plDaniels ripMime 1.3.2 .2
- 漏洞信息 (F34357)
|Corsaire Security Advisory 2003-08-04.5 (PacketStormID:F34357)|
|Martin O'Neal,Corsaire corsaire.com|
Corsaire Security Advisory - By using MIME encapsulation techniques centered on both standard and non-standard Content-Transfer-Encoding mechanisms, embedded file attachment blocking functionality can be evaded.
-- Corsaire Security Advisory -- Title: Multiple vendor MIME Content-Transfer-Encoding mechanism issue Date: 04.08.03 Application: various Environment: various Author: Martin O'Neal [email@example.com] Audience: General distribution Reference: c030804-005 -- Scope -- The aim of this document is to clearly define a MIME content evasion issue that affects a variety of products including; browsers, proxy servers, email clients, content security gateways and antivirus products. -- History -- Discovered: 04.08.03 (Martin O'Neal) NISCC notified: 28.01.04 Document released: 13.09.04 -- Overview -- There are a number of content security gateway and antivirus products available that provide policy based security functionality. Part of this functionality allows the products to block embedded file attachments based on their specific content type, such as executables or those containing viruses. However, by using MIME encapsulation techniques centred on both standard & non-standard Content-Transfer-Encoding mechanisms, this functionality can be evaded. -- Analysis -- The MIME standards are intended to provide a common mechanism to exchange data between systems and are used extensively by protocols such as HTTP and SMTP. The structure of a MIME message is defined in RFC2045 , which in turn makes use of concepts introduced in RFC822  (superseded by RFC2822 ). The standards define a range of fields that control how data is encoded within the transport, and how it should be interpreted by the receiving agent. RFC2045 provides the Content-Transfer-Encoding field, which allows the specification of an encoding type to allow 8bit data to travel successfully through 7bit transport mechanisms. Although the standard itself only provides for a limited set of encoding mechanisms (7bit, 8bit, binary, quoted-printable and base64), there are also a number of defacto mechanisms that are in use (uuencode, mac- binhex40 and yenc). The implementation of these encoding standards has not been universal by all of the vendors, and additionally there has also been a degree of variation in the actual mechanism value used within the Content- Transfer-Encoding header field. For example the uuencode mechanism may be specified interchangeably as "uue", "x-uue" or "x-uuencode" (plus others). For many products, such as email clients and browsers, this scope for variation might only result in some unreliable behaviour. However, for a collection of security products, being unaware of the various ways that the standard has been implemented can lead to more serious results, as the products may fail to detect a threat within the data stream. When a receiving agent is presented with a MIME message that contains an unknown Content-Transfer-Encoding mechanism, it tends to respond in one of two broad ways: - It identifies the MIME message as malformed and blocks it. - It fails to interpret the MIME field (or message). The first of the two would be the correct behaviour for a security conscious product, but based on empirical research this is not the common result for a number of scenarios. The Content-Transfer-Encoding mechanism issue has been observed to affect many of the security products. To use this issue as an attack vector, all that is required is to identify a target that has a client agent that successfully interprets the chosen Content-Transfer-Encoding mechanism, where any security products that protect it do not. -- Recommendations -- To be effective tools, the security products must not only be able to process encoding techniques implemented as per the relevant standard, but also common misinterpretations and deliberate corruptions. As an ongoing process, a study project should be undertaken by the vendors to identify applications that routinely decode MIME objects and have a liberal interpretation of the MIME standard. NISCC have produced a document consolidating a number of vendor statements on these issues . Contact your vendor directly to establish whether you are affected by these issues. -- Background -- This issue was discovered using a custom SMTP/HTTP vulnerability analysis tool developed by Corsaire's security assessment team. This tool is not available publicly, but is an example of the specialist approach used by Corsaire's consultants as part of a commercial security assessment. To find out more about the cutting edge services provided by Corsaire simply visit our web site at http://www.corsaire.com -- CVE -- The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project has assigned the name CAN-2004-0051 to this issue. This is a candidate for inclusion in the CVE list (http://cve.mitre.org), which standardises names for security problems. -- References --  http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html  http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html  http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html  http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/380375/mime.htm -- Revision -- a. Initial release. b. Released. -- Distribution -- This security advisory may be freely distributed, provided that it remains unaltered and in its original form. -- Disclaimer -- The information contained within this advisory is supplied "as-is" with no warranties or guarantees of fitness of use or otherwise. Corsaire accepts no responsibility for any damage caused by the use or misuse of this information. -- About Corsaire -- Corsaire are a leading information security consultancy, founded in 1997 in Guildford, Surrey, UK. Corsaire bring innovation, integrity and analytical rigour to every job, which means fast and dramatic security performance improvements. Our services centre on the delivery of information security planning, assessment, implementation, management and vulnerability research. A free guide to selecting a security assessment supplier is available at http://www.penetration-testing.com Copyright 2003 Corsaire Limited. All rights reserved.
|Multiple Content Monitor Software Multiple Content-Transfer-Encoding Value Bypass|
Unknown or Incomplete
Unknown or Incomplete
|Unknown or Incomplete|