发布时间 :2003-12-15 00:00:00
修订时间 :2008-09-05 16:35:36

[原文]eo420_GetStringFromVarPart in veo420.c for SAP database server (SAP DB) and earlier may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a connect packet with a 256 byte segment to the niserver (aka serv.exe) process on TCP port 7269, which prevents the server from NULL terminating the string and leads to a buffer overflow.

[CNNVD]SAP DB权限提升及缓冲区溢出漏洞(CNNVD-200312-063)


- CVSS (基础分值)

CVSS分值: 7.5 [严重(HIGH)]
机密性影响: PARTIAL [很可能造成信息泄露]
完整性影响: PARTIAL [可能会导致系统文件被修改]
可用性影响: PARTIAL [可能会导致性能下降或中断资源访问]
攻击复杂度: LOW [漏洞利用没有访问限制 ]
攻击向量: [--]
身份认证: NONE [漏洞利用无需身份认证]

- CPE (受影响的平台与产品)


- OVAL (用于检测的技术细节)


- 官方数据库链接
(官方数据源) MITRE
(官方数据源) NVD
(官方数据源) CNNVD

- 其它链接及资源

- 漏洞信息

SAP DB权限提升及缓冲区溢出漏洞
2003-12-15 00:00:00 2012-12-07 00:00:00

- 公告与补丁


- 漏洞信息 (F32205)

Atstake Security Advisory 03-11-17.1 (PacketStormID:F32205)
2003-11-17 00:00:00
Atstake,Ollie Whitehouse,Dino Dai Zovi

Atstake Security Advisory A111703-1 - Using the SQLAT stored procedure, a local attacker can obtain system access by swapping the NETAPI32.DLL in the current working directory. There is also a remote buffer overflow in the niserver interface on TCP port 7629.

Hash: SHA1

                              @stake, Inc.

                           Security Advisory

Advisory Name: SAP DB priv. escalation/remote code execution
 Release Date: 11/17/2003
  Application: SAP DB (23-June-2003) and before
     Platform: Microsoft Windows NT4/2000/XP [1 and 2]
               Linux (IA32)                  [2]
               SUN Solaris                   [2]
               HPUX                          [2]
               Compaq True64                 [2]
     Severity: local priv escalation to SYSTEM on Windows
               potential remote code execution
      Authors: Ollie Whitehouse []
               Dino Dai Zovi    []
Vendor Status: Vendor has patches available
CVE Candidate: CAN-2003-0938 - privilege gain via fake "NETAPI32.DLL"
               CAN-2003-0939 - buffer overflow in niserver interface


     SAP's ( open source database server
is a project which is sponsored by SAP AG. The database server
allows for a fast, flexible, high performance and easily administered
deployment of an enterprise level database solution.

There exists a number of vulnerabilities in the core SAPDB code that
allow a local attacker on Windows machines to elevate privileges or
remotely compromise the SAPDB server unauthenticated on Windows and
other supported platforms.

The vulnerabilities outlined below in the advisory are good examples
of why functionality should be evaluated in terms of new
vulnerabilities and risks they may introduce before being deployed in
a production environment.


[1] Local Windows privilege escalation
Credit: Ollie Whitehouse

This is a common Windows (
programming error in the SAP DB core code. Located within
'/V74_03_27/SAPDB_ORG/sys/src/os/vos24u.c' are the following lines
of code:

     line 62: #define NET_API_DLL       "NETAPI32.DLL"

     Then the following line allows exploitation

     line 143:   hinst = LoadLibrary( NET_API_DLL );

If an attacker has write access to the current working directory of
the SAP DB (which is the default as SAP does not lock down the file
permissions on WindowsNT) and can place a fake 'NETAPI32.DLL' SAPDB
will search working directory first and thus load the fake
'NETAPI32.DLL' and obtain system access.

This vulnerability can be exploited via the 'SQLAT' stored procedure
on SAP DB.

[2] Remote unauthenticated buffer overflow in 'niserver' interface
Credit: Dino Dai Zovi

In the default installation of SAP DB, the 'niserver' (on Unix) or
'serv.exe' (on Windows) process is listening on TCP port 7629
(sapdbni72) running as root or LocalSystem.  This interface is used
by the SAP support team to connect to customer SAP installations.
There is a buffer overflow in the code to extract strings from the
variable-sized segment of the connect packet.

The vulnerable code is in the function eo420_GetStringFromVarPart in
/V74_03_27/SAPDB_ORG/sys/src/eo/veo420.c (all comments are @stake's):

  [Code segment from: eo/veo420.c]

  ulLength = pConnectPacket->ConnectLength  -
             ( sizeof (*pConnectPacket) -
               sizeof (pConnectPacket->VarPart) );

  ulLength = MIN_EO420 ( ulLength, sizeof (pConnectPacket->VarPart)

  // @stake comment:
  // Items in variable-sized segment are stored:
  // [1-byte length] [1-byte type] [ data ... ]
  for ( ulPos =  0;
        ulPos <  ulLength;
        ulPos += pConnectPacket->VarPart[ulPos] & 0xff )
    if ( pConnectPacket->VarPart[ulPos + 1] == StringID )
  // @stake comment:
  // error checking code removed for brevity checked that declared
  // data length >= 2 and < MaxStringLen and that ulPos < ulLength.
  // The string data from the packet is copied without regard to
  // destination string length leading to a buffer overflow.
  strcpy (szString, (const char*)(pConnectPacket->VarPart + ulPos +

The variable-sized segment is limited to 256 bytes in length and the
destination string buffer is a 256-byte char array.  However, if a
string in the variable-sized segment is the maximum length and not
NULL-terminated, the strcpy will copy memory following the end of
the received packet, overrunning the bounds of the destination
buffer leading to potential remote code execution.

Vendor Response:

     @stake have contacted the vendor multiple times during
September 2003. Below is the time line of the communication:

     03-Sep-2003:    @stake informs vendor
     07-Nov-2003:    SAP releases version which fixes
                     all of the @stake reported vulnerabilities.
     17-Nov-2003:    Release

The vendor has patches and a new version available.

- From the vendor release notes:

PTS: 1124004    since:

    Bug fixed:
        1) Preconditions and circumstances
        This is a security fix. It protects against potential
        buffer overflow using a specialized 'intrusion' program,
        that could
        execute code an behalf of the owner of 'niserver' or
        The possible attack position is inside common used code
        shared between all platforms.
        2) Probability that the error occurs
        low (no such program was ever known off, but the code would
        allow to write it...). If such a program was written: 100%
        3) Solution to the problem
        The copy routines is modified to check the string for being
        correctly terminated by a zero byte. If not the connection
        packet is rejected.
        4) Visibility
        it depends on the action taken by the intruders coding...
        5) Workaround


        If you are running on the Windows platform make sure that the
permissions for the SAP DB working directory are set so that only
administrators have write access.  This is not the default.

        On all platforms port 7269 should be filtered by a network
or host based firewall to only allow those machines that need to
connect to the niserver service to connect.

        Enterprises should look to upgrade to the lastest version
of SAP DB which fixes these vulnerabilities, version It is
avaliable at:

Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) Information:

The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project has assigned
the following names to these issues.  These are candidates for
inclusion in the CVE list (, which standardizes
names for security problems.

  CAN-2003-0938 - privilege gain via fake "NETAPI32.DLL"
  CAN-2003-0939 - buffer overflow in niserver interface

@stake Vulnerability Reporting Policy:

@stake Advisory Archive:

PGP Key:

@stake is currently seeking application security experts to fill
several consulting positions.  Applicants should have strong
application development skills and be able to perform application
security design reviews, code reviews, and application penetration
testing.  Please send resumes to

Copyright 2003 @stake, Inc. All rights reserved.

Version: PGP 8.0



- 漏洞信息

SAP DB niserver Interface Overflow
Input Manipulation
Loss of Integrity

- 漏洞描述

SAP DB versions and earlier have a buffer overflow in the eo420_GetStringFromVarPart function, caused by improper bounds checking. By sending a large packet to the niserver interface listening on TCP port 7269, a remote attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the server

- 时间线

2003-11-17 2003-11-17
Unknow Unknow

- 解决方案

Upgrade to version or higher, as it has been reported to fix this vulnerability. An upgrade is required as there are no known workarounds.

- 相关参考

- 漏洞作者

Unknown or Incomplete